Home > Business > What Business Would You Want To Be In?

What Business Would You Want To Be In?

July 20th, 2009

Quick informal poll:

If you were going to start a business today, what kind of business model would you use?

My personal answer: currently leaning towards some form of software as a service, utilizing some type freemium model. But then so is everybody else, right? I have more to say on this, but want to hear what you think!

If you like this article, please share it with others:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
Author: Jeremy Lichtman Categories: Business Tags:
  1. July 21st, 2009 at 12:25 | #1

    Advising, brokering of information and resources. Interesting that you should ask this question (and for me to see it) now, as I am in the middle of writing an article about starting a business in this economy.

    • Jeremy Lichtman
      July 21st, 2009 at 17:56 | #2

      Interesting. I’ve spent most of my career in one form or another of consulting. Its an easy business to get into, the problem of course being that you can never stop working, since you get paid on a project or hourly basis. According to Nassim Nicholas Taleb, such “non-scalable” businesses are actually the safest to be in though, since there’s little substitute (yet) for skilled human labour.

      On the other hand, the lure of the huge “dot com” project still attracts most software developers like moths to a flame…

  2. Kirk West
    July 21st, 2009 at 17:54 | #3

    Now is the time to rethink existing businesses. A reimagination if you will. Move as many services online as possible

    • Jeremy Lichtman
      July 21st, 2009 at 18:02 | #4

      There’s an upside and a downside to that, of course.

      Software as a service is great for vendors, since they are “renting” out their product or service to their customers, rather than selling it. That means a (in theory) constant stream of revenue. Its also hard for an existing customer to leave (walled garden effect), which means that there’s at least some price elasticity.

      The downside is on the customer’s side. As a customer, I try and avoid any online service where I’m going to be locked in for a long time, particularly if I have concerns about data security / privacy etc. I also really don’t enjoy getting “dinged” each month, even if its a small amount. In time it adds up.

      I think the key for vendors of this service is to a) have a free basic service that allows people to grow into the paid version, b) provide a really high value premium service, and c) make sure that they have reasonable terms of service and policies that are enforced even-handedly. Its often hard to do this in practice though.

  3. July 22nd, 2009 at 06:55 | #5

    @Jeremy Lichtman
    Isn’t that your freemium model? I think you split the pros and cons of this system fairly well, you just forgot to call it by its name.

    • Jeremy Lichtman
      July 22nd, 2009 at 16:07 | #6

      Yup!

  4. sol
    July 29th, 2009 at 08:55 | #7

    I don’t know why, but the neologism “freemium” really annoys me. Maybe because the word just sound stupid. I’m pretty sure this is not a new business practice (just popular in a new medium – the web), why make up a new word for it?

    • Jeremy Lichtman
      July 29th, 2009 at 09:49 | #8

      Freemium is analogous to “gatecrasher special” or “loss leader”.

      The difference being that grocery stores don’t give away products as their entire business model, with advertising making up the difference. Although that would be a very interesting store…

  1. No trackbacks yet.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Services

  • Software Development
  • Web Development
  • Social Media
  • Search Engine Optimization

Partner Companies

Follow Us of Twitter